@conference {Bleyer2011,
	title = {Object stereo Joint stereo matching and object segmentation},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {3081{\textendash}3088},
	abstract = {This paper presents a method for joint stereo matching and object segmentation. In our approach a 3D scene is represented as a collection of visually distinct and spatially coherent objects. Each object is characterized by three different aspects: a color model, a 3D plane that approximates the object{\textquoteright}s disparity distribution, and a novel 3D connectivity property. Inspired by Markov Random Field models of image segmentation, we employ object-level color models as a soft constraint, which can aid depth estimation in powerful ways. In particular, our method is able to recover the depth of regions that are fully occluded in one input view, which to our knowledge is new for stereo matching. Our model is formulated as an energy function that is optimized via fusion moves. We show high-quality disparity and object segmentation results on challenging image pairs as well as standard benchmarks. We believe our work not only demonstrates a novel synergy between the areas of image segmentation and stereo matching, but may also inspire new work in the domain of automatic and interactive object-level scene manipulation. {\textcopyright} 2011 IEEE.},
	isbn = {9781457703942},
	issn = {10636919},
	doi = {10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995581},
	author = {Bleyer, Michael and Carsten Rother and Kohli, Pushmeet and Scharstein, Daniel and Sinha, Sudipta}
}
@article {Szeliski2008,
	title = {A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov random fields with smoothness-based priors},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence},
	volume = {30},
	number = {6},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {1068{\textendash}1080},
	publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
	abstract = {Among the most exciting advances in early vision has been the development of efficient energy minimization algorithms for pixel-labeling tasks such as depth or texture computation. It has been known for decades that such problems can be elegantly expressed as Markov random fields, yet the resulting energy minimization problems have been widely viewed as intractable. Recently, algorithms such as graph cuts and loopy belief propagation (LBP) have proven to be very powerful: for example, such methods form the basis for almost all the top-performing stereo methods. However, the tradeoffs among different energy minimization algorithms are still not well understood. In this paper we describe a set of energy minimization benchmarks and use them to compare the solution quality and running time of several common energy minimization algorithms. We investigate three promising recent methods graph cuts, LBP, and tree-reweighted message passing in addition to the well-known older iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm. Our benchmark problems are drawn from published energy functions used for stereo, image stitching, interactive segmentation, and denoising. We also provide a general-purpose software interface that allows vision researchers to easily switch between optimization methods. Benchmarks, code, images, and results are available at http://vision.middlebury.edu/ MRF/. {\textcopyright} 2008 IEEE.},
	keywords = {Belief propagation, Global optimization, Graph Cuts, Markov random fields, Performance evaluation},
	issn = {01628828},
	doi = {10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70844},
	url = {http://vision.middlebury.edu/MRF.},
	author = {Szeliski, Richard and Zabih, Ramin and Scharstein, Daniel and Veksler, Olga and Kolmogorov, Vladimir and Agarwala, Aseem and Tappen, Marshall and Carsten Rother}
}
@article {Szeliski2008a,
	title = {A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov random fields with smoothness-based priors},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence},
	volume = {30},
	number = {6},
	year = {2008},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {1068{\textendash}1080},
	abstract = {Among the most exciting advances in early vision has been the development of efficient energy minimization algorithms for pixel-labeling tasks such as depth or texture computation. It has been known for decades that such problems can be elegantly expressed as Markov random fields, yet the resulting energy minimization problems have been widely viewed as intractable. Recently, algorithms such as graph cuts and loopy belief propagation (LBP) have proven to be very powerful: for example, such methods form the basis for almost all the top-performing stereo methods. However, the tradeoffs among different energy minimization algorithms are still not well understood. In this paper we describe a set of energy minimization benchmarks and use them to compare the solution quality and running time of several common energy minimization algorithms. We investigate three promising recent methods graph cuts, LBP, and tree-reweighted message passing in addition to the well-known older iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm. Our benchmark problems are drawn from published energy functions used for stereo, image stitching, interactive segmentation, and denoising. We also provide a general-purpose software interface that allows vision researchers to easily switch between optimization methods. Benchmarks, code, images, and results are available at http://vision.middlebury.edu/ MRF/. {\textcopyright} 2008 IEEE.},
	keywords = {Belief propagation, Global optimization, Graph Cuts, Markov random fields, Performance evaluation},
	issn = {01628828},
	doi = {10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70844},
	author = {Szeliski, Richard and Zabih, Ramin and Scharstein, Daniel and Veksler, Olga and Kolmogorov, Vladimir and Agarwala, Aseem and Tappen, Marshall and Carsten Rother}
}
